Number One at the Box Office, and Still a Failure.

oblivionThe movies have changed a great deal in the last twenty years.  One of the most interesting changes is that it’s not that unusual anymore for someone to review the number one most seen movie in the country, and pronounce it a failure.  There is a simple reason for this; it’s because of special effects.

The latest movie that’s gotten this treatment has been Oblivion.  Upon it’s release it was the most watched movie in the country, making 37 million in a single week.  Despite that, it’s actually not that silly to call it a flop, because when you spend a hundred million on special effects, you need to make that money back quickly or investors will be angry.

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Rec/rec.arts.movies.current-films/2008-05/msg00278.html

The Golden Compass took in 70 million dollars domestically.  Unfortunately, it cost 180 million to make, a result so expensive it actually closed the doors of the studio which made it.  The real joke however is that affer New Line Studios closed its doors permanently, the movie went on to make 300 million overseas, easily making the goldenmoney back.  Originally slated to be a trilogy, it’s unlikely there will ever be a sequel, which is unfortunate for fans of the series.

The premise of the books was that every person had a beast that followed them around that was connected to their own soul.  This essentially required a massive amount of special effects since that many animals would have been impossible to manage.

Of course, that’s not the only reason that how success or failure in Hollywood is measured is so tricky.  For instance, you’ve probably heard of Forrest Gump.  It was well reviewed and made a lot of money.  And yet, when the author of the book came to collect his proceeds, they told him the movie actually lost money, and for that reason he was owed nothing.  Author Winston Groom ended up forestsuing to get the money and the matter was later settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.

The studio’s that produce movie’s can frequently manipulate which part of a production assumes the brunt of expenses, and then move the profits to another division, giving them the ability to cheat authors of a share of the profits, by declaring that there were no profits.  Hollywood is a rough place, particularly for writers.  After reading about a lot of instances like this, I wonder why more writers don’t demand all the money up front, rather then ask for a cut of the profits.

 

Related articles

Spring 2013 Anime Preview

Every three months, like clockwork, Japanese TV remakes itself. A bunch of shows end, a bunch more start, and many continuing series bring out new opening and closing sequences. Most anime series run for only three or six months. Throw in that there’s no such thing as rerun season, and that’s a lot of space […]

2 Comments

  1. Thanks for the very intelligent post. I wasn’t aware of some of the specific legality regarding screenplays that you describe. It makes sense to publish an original novel to protect yourself first, I think. I would imagine that getting a book published is easier then selling a screenplay frankly, but that’s just a guess.

  2. Hi Michael – –

    Your last comment about the money up front is interesting. Most of the books I’ve read on writing screenplays –all written by accomplished screenwriters– actually indicate that that is usually what happens … most screen writers very rarely get any points on the back end. A couple of authors (like Syd Feild) indicate that most speculative scripts average $300,000.00 to the spec author and then the studio passes the script on to an in-house writer. They try to get the original writer out of the mix quick.

    There is, of course, lots of variation on this story. One thing that’s important to know about the process is that screenwriters (unlike the practice with traditional hardcopy publications) can frequently find their story being passed around by multiple studio houses and directors…and a bidding war can drive the price of the script up astronomically.

    For my money, a writer should consider completing a novel version of the script and try to get that out into the market. There are several reasons for this. It alllows the writer to argue that the movie is only an adaptation and, as such, the writer retains rights to the story and is only licensing the screeplay. This allows the writer some creative control, but most importatntly, if you have a sequel in the works, you’re not going to be automatically ignored by the studio if they want to do a sequel of the screenplay. Your creative control over where the second novel is going can put the brakes on the studio when it decides it wants a sequel. At least it gives you some negotiating points.

    If you sell the screenplay outright, the studio usually buys all the usage rights, so it a means you’d lose out on the sequel, both to the next screenplay and to any forthcoming novels. That’s also when you get a shot a points because you’re an integral part of the ongoing story.

    Just food for thought.

    JJayJ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.